Understand statisticsAlways read statistics critically Look at things like:
- Date of publication (bearing in mind the gap between gathering data and publishing it): the research quoted should be the most current available
- Source: should be credible organisation, for example, Department of Health, Nelson Mandela/HSRC or UNAIDS.
- What method was used? Was it an antenatal (or sentinel) survey or a national household survey? Both of these methods have implications for the reliability and validity of the data.
- Understand key terms used in statistics (see our statistics factsheet and glossary for explanations of these terms)
Report the science of HIV accuratelyIt is very important to get the science right: in an environment of confusing messages and misleading information, audiences need to get accurate information. How?
- Define difficult terms(CD4 count, viral load, etc)
- Use accurate language – for example, “antiretrovirals (ARVs)” instead of “AIDS drugs”
- Understand the basics of prevention, treatment and care: for example, the natural progression of HIV/AIDS and the way ARVs work: a journalist needs to be able to communicate effectively on HIV and cannot do so without a solid understanding of the basics.
- Befriend a doctor or familiarise yourself with a resource like JournAIDS for quick facts and explanations of difficult scientific concepts.
Read press releases critically: don’t simply drop them straight into a story.
Ask questions like:
- Who is writing the press release?
- What agenda are they trying to advance?
- Question everything: even the things that seem to be natural and a given
Use a variety of sources: official and non-official.
Incorporate the voices of ordinary people infected and affected by HIV. Sources, especially PWLHAs, should always be treated sensitively and ethically, from the interview until publication.
‘AIDS fatigue’ is not as prevalent as we think. Editors want HIV stories to be written in interesting and new ways. With that said, journalists have to be invested in their stories and motivate foreditor buy-in.
Provide context for all your stories, which is abundant: social, economic, political, clinical, cultural, communal and individual. Clearly not all of this context can be provided in only one story but it can be built slowly over time as you report. This is going to be considered colour by your editors and you are going to have to fight for it, but it is really important to provide it for audiences. It enhances accuracy.
Photos are so important to stories. But they raise a lot of ethical issues. Be absolutely sure that you have informed consent to photograph sources in a way that either does or does not identify them.
Avoid generic photos for stories. They can be very damaging because they can promote stereotypes of HIV and AIDS.
The sick, dying images don’t work anymore. Often they aren’t even appropriate to what is being reported! Avoid them.
The media are doing much better job in using sensitive, non-stigmatising and non-judgmental language when reporting on HIV. The terms evolve, however, and it is best to familiarise oneself with a style guide (see the Ethics factsheet for one)
Workplace and editorial policy
Find out if your media house has a workplace policy on HIV and AIDS – chances are they don’t. And even slimmer that there is an editorial policy. If these aren’t in place advocate for them to be written. Why? Because the startin point for reporting meaningfully on HIV is to work in an environment that has considered issues like stigma and discrimination and has structures to account for the rights and responsibilities of all of its employees.
Don’twrite either hard news or human interest feature stories – try to incorporate accuracy, context, sensitive and non-stigmatising language in all of your stories – so that a reader can build up a body of knowledge over time.